NQ · LIVE ENGINE Algomyth
EN
Tax by country

1% vs 3% Withholding on Romanian Broker Trades Explained

The 1% and 3% withholding rates sound cheap next to the 10% you declare yourself. For an active futures trader they often are not, and the reason is what the rate applies to.

Published 10 min read By the Algomyth desk

Placa stradală Wall Street din New York, piața unde ajung ordinele traderilor români care compară regimul de reținere la sursă cu brokerii străini.

General information about tax rules, not tax or legal advice. Rules change and every situation is different: check with a qualified adviser in your country before you file.

Two numbers get quoted constantly in Romanian trading groups and almost nobody explains what sits behind them. One percent and three percent. They are the withholding rates a Romanian intermediary applies to your gains, and they sound wonderful next to the ten percent you pay when you declare foreign broker results yourself.

They are not always wonderful. For a long term investor the one percent branch is close to a gift. For an active futures trader the three percent branch can cost you more than the ten percent regime, sometimes several times more, and the reason has nothing to do with the rate. It has to do with what the rate is applied to.

Where the two numbers come from

Since 1 January 2023, following the changes brought by Law 142/2022 to the Fiscal Code, income from the transfer of securities and from operations with derivative financial instruments carried out through a Romanian intermediary is taxed by withholding at source. The intermediary calculates it, withholds it, declares it and pays it to the state. You do not file anything for that income.

The rate depends on how long you held the instrument:

Holding periodWithholding rateWho applies itFinal?
More than 365 days1%The Romanian intermediaryYes
Less than 365 days3%The Romanian intermediaryYes
No Romanian intermediary10% on the annual net gainYou, in Declarația unicăYes

The consolidated text of the Fiscal Code, including article 97 on withholding from investment income, is published by ANAF. Read the version in force for the year you are dealing with, because this particular corner of the code has been amended repeatedly since 2022 and the rates and the perimeter are exactly the kind of thing that gets adjusted in a fiscal package.

The design intent is not hidden. One percent for holding longer than a year, three percent for churning inside a year: the state is paying you to sit still. That is a sensible policy for someone building a portfolio. It is a policy written for a different person than you, if you trade index futures.

Who counts as a Romanian intermediary

This is where most of the confusion lives, because people assume "my broker" and "a Romanian intermediary" mean the same thing. They do not.

The withholding regime applies when the transaction is executed through an entity that the Fiscal Code recognises as an intermediary with Romanian reporting obligations. In practice that means a Romanian investment firm, a Romanian branch of a foreign firm, a credit institution operating here, or a fund manager, all of them supervised by the Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară, whose register of authorised entities is public and searchable.

What is not a Romanian intermediary:

  • A US futures commission merchant where you opened an account online, even if the website is translated into Romanian.
  • An EU investment firm passporting into Romania without a branch here. Passporting is not the same as having a Romanian establishment with withholding duties.
  • Any offshore entity, regardless of what its support chat tells you.

The practical test is simple. At the end of the year, does the firm hand you a Romanian tax statement showing tax withheld and paid on your behalf? If yes, you are in the withholding regime. If all you get is a trading statement in dollars, you are in the self declaration regime and the ten percent applies to you.

Check the register before you open an account, not after. The same authority also publishes investor alerts about firms operating without authorisation, and reading that list takes two minutes.

The detail that changes everything: gross versus net

Here is the part that is almost never mentioned when the one and three percent numbers get thrown around.

Under the withholding regime, the tax is calculated on each transaction that produces a gain. The intermediary computes the gain on that transfer, applies one or three percent, withholds it and moves on. The losing transactions do not enter the calculation. There is no annual netting step, because there is no annual declaration: the tax is final at the moment it is withheld.

Under the self declaration regime with a foreign broker, you compute the annual net gain. Winners minus losers, across the whole year, and ten percent applies to what is left. If the year ends negative, the net loss is reported and carried forward against future gains of the same nature, within the window the Fiscal Code sets.

Three percent of your gross winners versus ten percent of your net. That is the real comparison, and which one wins depends entirely on one number: how much of your gross profit survives your losing trades.

A second detail worth understanding is how the 365 days get counted when you buy the same instrument several times. The clock runs per acquisition, not per position, so a holding you built in four purchases across a year can produce both one percent and three percent slices when you sell it in one click. The intermediary applies the ordering method the law requires and you will see the result on the statement rather than choosing it. For an index futures trader this is academic, because every contract you touch dies inside its own quarter, but if you also hold shares through the same firm it explains statements that otherwise look inconsistent.

The arithmetic, with actual lei

Take three traders. All three end the year with the same twenty thousand lei in their pocket before tax. Their trading styles are completely different.

Gross gainsGross lossesNet resultWithheld at 3%10% on net
Scalper, 900 trades220,000 lei200,000 lei20,000 lei6,600 lei2,000 lei
Swing trader, 60 trades50,000 lei30,000 lei20,000 lei1,500 lei2,000 lei
Position trader, 8 trades23,000 lei3,000 lei20,000 lei690 lei2,000 lei

Read the first row again. The scalper pays an effective rate of 33 percent on the money actually earned, under a regime advertised as three percent. The position trader pays an effective 3.5 percent. Same net income, tax bill nearly ten times apart, and the only variable is turnover.

Now the case nobody wants to think about. A losing year. Gross gains 180,000 lei, gross losses 210,000 lei, net minus 30,000 lei.

  • Withholding regime: three percent was withheld on every winning transaction along the way. Roughly 5,400 lei left your account during a year in which you lost money. It is final. There is nothing to reclaim and nothing to carry forward.
  • Self declaration regime: zero tax, and a 30,000 lei loss reported and available against future gains within the carry forward window.

That asymmetry is the single strongest argument for an active trader, and it is invisible in the headline rates. Numbers above are illustrations of the mechanism, not a quote of your situation.

Where CME futures actually fit

Now the specific question for anyone trading MNQ, MES, NQ, ES, CL or GC.

First, the 365 day branch is theoretical for you. Index futures roll quarterly and an intraday trader holds positions for minutes. You will never touch the one percent rate. If you end up inside the withholding regime, you are in the three percent branch, permanently. So the honest comparison for a futures trader is not one versus three. It is three percent of gross versus ten percent of net, and the table above tells you how that ends for someone with high turnover.

Second, the population of Romanian intermediaries offering direct CME futures access with a NinjaTrader 8 connection is very small. Most Romanian brokerage is built around the Bucharest exchange and European equities. Most people trading ES and NQ from Romania do it through a US futures commission merchant or an EU firm, which means they are in the self declaration regime whether they thought about it or not.

Third, be careful about what instrument you are actually trading. A CFD on the Nasdaq is not a CME future. It is a different contract, with a different counterparty, different costs and a different position in the Fiscal Code. If someone sells you "Nasdaq trading" and there is no exchange, no contract month and no tick value, it is not what this article is about.

For declaring foreign income, remember that amounts in dollars have to be converted into lei using the exchange rate rule that applies to that category of income. The reference rates come from the Banca Națională a României, and which rate you use, the one for the day or the annual average, depends on the income type. Ask your accountant to confirm before you fill in Declarația unică, because getting this wrong quietly changes every number in the return.

The cash flow difference nobody budgets for

Even when the two routes end up at a similar total, they do not feel the same during the year, and for a trader running a small account the difference is real money.

In the withholding regime the tax leaves your account continuously. Every winning transaction is trimmed at the moment it settles. You never see that money, you never trade with it, and you never earn anything on it. Your working capital is permanently a little smaller than your equity curve suggests.

In the self declaration regime, nothing is taken during the year. You compute the net at year end and pay once, when you file. That means you carry the full amount as margin for twelve months. It also means the discipline is on you: the money is sitting in the account looking like profit, and in May it is not yours. Traders who blow up in the first quarter of the following year are very often traders who spent last year's tax.

If you are in the self declaration route, move the estimated tax out of the trading account monthly. Not because the state asks you to, but because a margin account is the worst possible place to store a liability. Treat it the way you would treat VAT if you ran a shop.

CASS does not disappear in either regime

The withholding is income tax. It is not the whole bill.

The health contribution, CASS, is assessed separately, at ten percent, on a base tied to the gross minimum wage and triggered in steps: six, twelve and twenty four minimum wages of annual income in the relevant basket. Below the first step you owe nothing. Above it you owe ten percent of a fixed base, not of your income, which is why crossing a threshold by one leu costs the same as crossing it by ten thousand.

Two points that matter for this comparison:

  • Investment income counts towards that basket even when the income tax on it was already withheld at source. The intermediary handles the one or three percent. It does not handle your CASS. That remains your filing, in Declarația unică, and forgetting it is the most common unpleasant surprise in Romanian trading.
  • The reference minimum wage changes. It was 4,050 lei per month for 2025. Do not reuse that figure for another year without checking the one in force, and do not reuse anyone's spreadsheet from a forum. The current rules, forms and deadlines sit on the ANAF page for Declarația unică, and the health insurance side is administered by CNAS.

What to check before you choose a route

The decision is not "which rate is lower". It is a short list of concrete questions.

  • What is my turnover ratio? Take last year's statement. Gross winning gains divided by net result. If that ratio is above roughly three, the three percent withholding regime is already more expensive than ten percent on the net. Above ten, it is punitive.
  • Does the firm actually withhold? Ask for it in writing, and ask which article they apply. An intermediary in the regime will answer immediately, because it is a reporting obligation they already carry.
  • Can I even get the products I trade? There is no point optimising tax on a route that does not offer CME futures with a platform connection you can work with.
  • What happens in a losing year? Ask yourself this before a good year makes you complacent. The carry forward in the self declaration route has real value that the withholding route does not offer.
  • Is the firm in the ASF register? Two minutes, done before the transfer rather than after.

One last thing. Futures are leveraged. You can lose more than you deposited, and a tax structure does not change that, it only changes what happens to what is left. Choosing a route because it is cheaper on tax, while trading a size that does not survive a bad Wednesday, is optimising the wrong end of the problem.

This article is general information about how the Romanian rules are built, not tax or legal advice. The Fiscal Code, the rates, the CASS thresholds and the filing deadlines change, often mid year, so check the current text on the official pages linked above and take your own figures to a Romanian tax consultant before you decide anything.

1% vs 3% withholding on romanian broker trades

Educational content, not investment advice. Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Any reference to Algomyth results is hypothetical, simulated over historical data, and shown in full on the performance page; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Algomyth Live

Take the seat: watch the engines live

Three specialist engines on Nasdaq, S&P and Gold, every signal streamed the moment it happens, with the stop and the target written before the trade. From $149 a month per market.